Suggest modification to this talk

Title

Description

Date

Summarized using AI?

If this talk's summary was generated by AI, please check this box. A "Summarized using AI" badge will be displayed in the summary tab to indicate that the summary was generated using AI.

Show "Summarized using AI" badge on summary page

Summary

Markdown supported

In the video "How Do I Review The Code," Denys Yahofarov presents insights from his experiences in software engineering, particularly focusing on the processes and principles surrounding code reviews. Denys, currently working at Solaris Bank, recognizes code reviews as essential for maintaining a healthy codebase and fostering a collaborative environment.

The key points discussed throughout the presentation include:

- **Purpose of Code Reviews**: Denys engages in code reviews to gain knowledge, provide feedback, and mentor team members. He emphasizes the importance of discussions happening asynchronously and in context to promote visibility and learning.
- **Regulatory Requirements**: At Solaris Bank, it is required that a minimum of one engineer reviews any code before it can be merged, which ensures that no one can push code directly to the master branch.
- **Code Review Principles**:
  - Value should be deployed unless it is purely a proof of concept.
  - Recognize and respect contributions from all team members regardless of their experience levels.
  - Seek something positive in all code reviewed, even if weaknesses are present.
  - Focus on overall structure and functionality first, and adhere to test-driven development methodologies.
- **Approach to Feedback**: Pricing of comments, Denys avoids nitpicking and instead prefers to use automated tools for style and syntax adherence. When providing feedback, he emphasizes clear communication and respects the contributor's time.
- **Managing Code Review Workflow**: He highlights the importance of prompt merging of pull requests and creating a collaborative environment by proposing changes in follow-up pull requests.
- **Continuous Learning**: Denys mentions that he maintains professionalism even when critiquing code, acknowledging that contributors do their best under various circumstances and that missed cues can affect feedback.
- **Encouraging Culture of Improvement**: Finally, he advocates for a constructive atmosphere where every team member feels valued and respected for their contributions towards continuous improvement in code quality.

In conclusion, Yahofarov stresses that code reviews should serve as a vital part of a development culture, reinforcing good practices and building a solid environment for teamwork. He encourages open dialogue and collaboration to cultivate a productive experience for all participants. The session ends with an interactive Q&A, further highlighting relevant concerns such as feedback handling, pair programming, and time management between coding and reviews.

Cancel