Programming Languages

Summarized using AI

Keynote: 30 Years of Ruby

Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto • December 15, 2023 • Taipai, Taiwan

In the keynote "30 Years of Ruby" at RubyConf Taiwan 2023, Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto, the creator of Ruby, reflects on the 30-year journey of the programming language since its inception in 1993. Although he could not attend the conference in person due to a medical procedure, he emphasizes the importance of the Ruby community and the enthusiasm surrounding the language. Matz shares lessons learned from programming history and language design that have shaped Ruby's evolution.

Key Points:
- Origins of Ruby: Ruby started as a hobby project for Matz, inspired by his early frustrations with limited programming languages and environments.
- Historical Insights: Matz explores early programming languages, highlighting Plankalkül by Konrad Zuse as an example of visionary ideas lost to history due to lack of implementation.
- Importance of Implementation: Matz stresses the need for usable programming languages that evolve alongside their users, as evidenced by the challenges faced by Plankalkül.
- Simplicity vs. Complexity: While simplicity in programming languages is desirable, Matz argues that an overly simple language leads to more complex software. Ruby's design balances complexity and usability to reflect human thinking and applications.
- Creeping Featurism: The speaker discusses the danger of adding too many features to languages, referencing Perl's history, where excessive complexity led to developer fatigue and stagnation.
- Gradual Development: Matz describes Ruby’s incremental improvement approach, allowing for features to gradually enhance the language without overwhelming users. This is exemplified by the shift from Ruby 1.8 to Ruby 1.n, which focused on refinement over radical changes.
- Dynamic Typing Identity: Ruby maintains a dynamic typing system but is open to exploring optional static typing features, emphasizing community feedback in the decision-making process.
- Future Vision: Matz encourages the community to participate actively in shaping Ruby for the next 30 years, promoting an ongoing evolution that resonates with modern programming realities. He expresses his ambition for Ruby to remain relevant and to aim for "Ruby 40" with strategic grassroots development.

Concluding Takeaway:
Matz underscores the continuous need for engagement within the Ruby community to ensure the language remains accessible and valuable for developers worldwide. He thanks the attendees and invites them to contribute to Ruby's future, signifying the collaborative spirit integral to its success.

Keynote: 30 Years of Ruby
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto • December 15, 2023 • Taipai, Taiwan

#rubyconftw 2023

Lessons Matz has learned from the history of Ruby development

RubyConf Taiwan 2023

00:00:28.960 Hello there, I'm Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto, the creator of the Ruby language. I apologize for not being able to attend RubyConf Taiwan physically this year. I was planning to be there but, at the end of last month, I discovered an issue with my right eye's retina that required an operation. Don’t worry too much; the operation went well, and I am recovering.
00:00:36.040 However, to avoid any risks, I decided to cancel my trip to Taiwan. I'm truly sorry about that, but I'm glad you are here attending the conference. It's heartwarming to see so many people showing interest and love for my programming language.
00:00:43.960 This year, I'm going to talk about the 30 years of Ruby. In fact, 2023 marks the 30th anniversary of Ruby’s development; I started developing it back in 1993, exactly 30 years ago. It began as a hobby project. I started programming when I was 15, using the BASIC programming language on a very limited computer. The computer had a tiny subset of BASIC language, and I found it frustrating due to its limitations, such as only having global variables, no recursion, and no function names, just GOTO statements and arguments passed only through global variables.
00:02:05.200 That programming environment felt very limiting, and since I didn't know any other languages, I thought programming was a complicated and frustrating endeavor. One day, I discovered a book on the programming language Pascal in a local bookstore. I bought it and read through it, which opened my eyes to the existence of many programming languages. I realized that the frustration I felt could be addressed by better programming language design. This awakening sparked my love for programming languages, leading me to study many of them.
00:02:57.600 Ruby, my language, is a product of this passion for programming languages. You could call me a language geek; I appreciate many programming languages and enjoy learning about their trivia. Let me share some lessons we can learn from the history of programming languages. For example, one question that often comes up is: What is the first programming language in the world? In many discussions, FORTRAN, developed around 1954, is often considered the first programming language.
00:04:04.640 However, before FORTRAN, there was a language named Plankalkül, devised by the German engineer Konrad Zuse for his computer, the Z3. Zuse's work was groundbreaking as he sought to develop a more abstract way to communicate human ideas to computers, beyond mere machine language. His papers included concepts like assignments, conditional statements, loops, arrays, and exceptions, which were visionary, particularly in the early 1940s.
00:05:19.200 Unfortunately, Plankalkül was lost to history, mostly due to the turmoil caused by World War II, which hindered Zuse's development of his ideas. He later reassembled his thoughts and published a specification for Plankalkül in 1972. However, implementing it was a challenge, as its concepts were so advanced that no implementation was available until 1998, well after the development of Ruby.
00:06:41.039 This teaches us that having an idea is important, but having a working implementation and fostering evolution is far more critical. We must provide usable implementations and develop alongside our users. This is the first lesson from the history of Plankalkül.
00:07:28.240 The second lesson relates to simplicity in programming languages. I can name a few languages known for their simplicity, such as Lisp, Forth, and APL, all born in the 1960s. Unfortunately, none of them gained long-term popularity, which can be explained by a quote from Larry Wall, the creator of Perl: "If a language is simple, our software will become more complex because the total amount of complexity is constant." This insight reflects the idea that while a simple language may seem beneficial, it often leads to more complex software in practice.
00:08:43.440 In fact, Ruby is not the simplest language; although it appears straightforward, it is quite complex internally. Ruby aims to simplify application development for humans, as human thoughts are complex. Thus, to adequately reflect our mental models, a programming language like Ruby needs to incorporate some level of complexity. In this sense, we can learn from Perl and other languages about the balance between simplicity and practicality.
00:09:51.159 Within the community, there’s a common discussion about programming languages that have become too complex due to their features. Some languages aim to provide every imaginable feature, resulting in what I call "creeping featurism." If we continue to add every feature, applications can grow too large and cumbersome to manage effectively. Therefore, it’s crucial to maintain some level of simplicity in both programming languages and applications.
00:11:03.120 Pearl, for instance, gives us lessons regarding maintaining language simplicity amid feature expansion. The name Ruby was indeed inspired by Perl, and I learned a lot from it. As time passed, Perl faced challenges where its core developers felt weighed down by historical burdens, leading them to claim they were bored with stagnation.
00:12:14.520 Recognizing this boredom, the Perl community began to launch new projects to redefine their language, resulting in many proposals to revive interest. They compiled a set of design guidelines known as the "apocalypses" in an effort to reimagine Perl as Perl 6. Unfortunately, despite the evolution and potential of Perl 6 (now known as Raku), it did not achieve the desired popularity, which serves as another cautionary tale about the importance of keeping a programming community engaged and excited.
00:13:30.600 Boredom is a significant enemy of any open-source project. We must keep moving forward to maintain interest. Continually improving our tools and language is critical to avoiding stagnation. Thus, Ruby's development has been about incremental improvements rather than drastic, sweeping changes that lead to historical burdens.
00:14:41.000 As I mentioned before, I attempted to follow Perl’s example at RubyConf 2003 by introducing Ruby 2. My aim was to create a language without historical burdens. However, I learned many lessons from this endeavor. I initially collected exciting RFC proposals but eventually abandoned the ideas due to the fatigue of managing so many changes. Instead, I focused on gradually improving Ruby without discarding the past.
00:15:23.200 This gradual approach was what led to Ruby 1.n, an iterative improvement of Ruby 1.8. It allowed us to focus on enhancing the core of the language, introducing better features without creating excessive complexity or confusion for users. We faced some incompatibility, especially regarding string encoding, but our careful and gradual approach yielded better overall results.
00:16:32.960 Reflecting on the languages in the community, we can see how various factors, such as performance and upgrade paths, influence user retention and involvement. As developers, we want to ensure that the improvements we make reflect the needs and realities of modern programming while also remaining true to Ruby's original philosophy.
00:17:50.560 The discussion surrounding static typing continues to emerge, as seen with languages like Rust, Go, and TypeScript. Ruby intentionally avoids static typing, valuing dynamic typing as a part of its identity. However, we are exploring ways to implement optional static-type features. This would be beneficial in instances without compromising Ruby's essence.
00:19:03.120 Even so, approaches must be carefully measured to ensure that they don't introduce unnecessary complexity or reduce Ruby's accessibility for new developers. Community input is vital to maintaining Ruby's forward momentum and identifying areas for potential improvement.
00:20:25.680 While we can't predict the future exactly, our continuous efforts to evaluate and adapt Ruby will shape its path. We aim for a sustainable Ruby that not only endures for the next 30 years but continues to create impactful value for users in the community. Aiming for Ruby 40 may sound ambitious, but I believe that with the right strategy and focus on grassroots development, it could be a reality.
00:21:43.440 As we move forward, I encourage all of you to actively participate in the Ruby community. Together, we can ensure that Ruby remains relevant, accessible, and valuable to developers worldwide. Your ideas and contributions matter. Let's create the future of Ruby together.
00:22:57.960 Thank you all once again for being a part of this conference and contributing to the Ruby community. I truly appreciate your presence here.
00:23:34.080 Now, let's move into a Q&A session. If you have any questions, please feel free to raise your hand, and I will pass the microphone to you. I apologize for not being there to engage directly, but I truly value this interaction and look forward to your questions.
Explore all talks recorded at RubyConf Taiwan 2023
+19